John J Mearsheimer concurs with Sachs - destabilizing is the descriptive used:
It was unthinkable during the Cold War to even countenance striking the Soviet’s strategic nuclear forces unless there was a major crisis like the Cuban missile crisis in 1962. Why? First, there was the fear of immediate nuclear escalation. Second, even if there was no escalation right away, the United States would have signaled to the Soviets that it was willing to pursue an extremely risky strategy that might cause Soviet leaders to think Washington was preparing for a splendid first strike. In a future crisis, this would be highly destabilizing.
I disagree with just about everything written here. Greta Thunberg is a pampered, petulant, naive, dumb, gullible, stupid, extroverted, kid who has been used by politicians and the media to push the AGW propaganda. There is no "global warming" by us humans. In fact, there is no "greenhouse effect" in Earth's atmosphere, no such thing as a "greenhouse gas" and certainly no "climate change"
Extremely glad tidings for our children, grandchildren and future generations.
Mack
Sky Dragon Slayer.
Btw We are in no more danger of getting into WW3 with the Russians than we have been for the last 80 years. You can sanction the Russians until you're blue in the face but it will not make a jot of difference to the resolve of the Russians and particularly the little dickhead running the place.
They only understand force, you know, Russian roulette.
John J Mearsheimer concurs with Sachs - destabilizing is the descriptive used:
It was unthinkable during the Cold War to even countenance striking the Soviet’s strategic nuclear forces unless there was a major crisis like the Cuban missile crisis in 1962. Why? First, there was the fear of immediate nuclear escalation. Second, even if there was no escalation right away, the United States would have signaled to the Soviets that it was willing to pursue an extremely risky strategy that might cause Soviet leaders to think Washington was preparing for a splendid first strike. In a future crisis, this would be highly destabilizing.
https://substack.com/inbox/post/165489114?utm_source=unread-posts-digest-email&inbox=true&utm_medium=email&triedRedirect=true
I find I rarely agree with Sachs and his statements you give here are no different.
I disagree with just about everything written here. Greta Thunberg is a pampered, petulant, naive, dumb, gullible, stupid, extroverted, kid who has been used by politicians and the media to push the AGW propaganda. There is no "global warming" by us humans. In fact, there is no "greenhouse effect" in Earth's atmosphere, no such thing as a "greenhouse gas" and certainly no "climate change"
Here is the science..
https://www.climateconversation.org.nz/2021/02/science-says-change-the-weather-and-break-the-countrys-heart/
This last comment of mine, including the links, explains just about everything...
https://www.climateconversation.org.nz/2021/02/science-says-change-the-weather-and-break-the-countrys-heart/#comment-1596412
Extremely glad tidings for our children, grandchildren and future generations.
Mack
Sky Dragon Slayer.
Btw We are in no more danger of getting into WW3 with the Russians than we have been for the last 80 years. You can sanction the Russians until you're blue in the face but it will not make a jot of difference to the resolve of the Russians and particularly the little dickhead running the place.
They only understand force, you know, Russian roulette.
Cheers
Mack.